The little differences …

lodge-emblem.jpgLast night I visited another lodge, Lodge 500, in Dublin. The work in the lodge room was kept brief to allow time for their Installation dinner. It was an enjoyable evening in the presence of the Brethren and the Deputy Grand Master, and it was of particular interest to me, as such an occasion is often used to look at the current state of affairs in a broader perspective. Lodge 500 certainly seemed like a healthy lodge, with a good age mix (and last year Irish freemasonry experienced a slight net increase in membership).

I also got to thinking about some of the differences between freemasonry in Denmark and Ireland (beyond the obvious differences in ritual), based on what was emphasised. Three things seemed central: fellowship, charity and ritual. Where as in Denmark I would consider these two things the biggest motivations to become a freemason: fellowship and self-improvement.

So fellowship – freemasonry being a universal fraternity – seems to be the backbone for both. And you might rightly say that self-improvement is also important to Irish masons (and they are not in my mind that different from most other Anglo-Saxon mainstream masons), but it is more implicit: It is expounded in the ritual and expressed through charity. In Swedish Rite it is much more at the forefront, and on an evening such as this, it would be unthinkable that it wasn’t at all addressed in some philosophical way. These moral and (in the case of Swedish Rite) spritual lessons are also not so much taught (through the words of the ritual) as exemplified and experienced – it is more of a personal journey that invites reflection. Swedish Rite doesn’t have the same emphasis on word-perfect ritual, as we use ritual books and don’t go through the chairs – it is a means rather than an end.

This is something that I will be contemplating further, and can only touch upon slightly at this point. They are not huge differences, but they do make it clearer to me what I am missing. I should probably emphasise that I in no way am saying that one is better than the other – but I joined for a particular brand of fremmasonry, and I am coming to realise that this tradition is rarer than I had thought.

This was also the last Dublin chapter, as on Tuesday we head out for Boston …


3 thoughts on “The little differences …

  1. Thats interesting, I had no idea that Irish masons do not move through the chairs. And open ritual books? I suppose it would only affect the idea of candidate proficiency, which we in America are having a debate about now. Are we rushing the candidates through, the question. I heard that Scandinavian Freemasonry has a much more Christian focus and that Swedenborgs work much affected it. Is that true?

  2. Swedenborg was not a Freemason and he did not affect the Swedish system of Freemasonry in any way I know of.

    I don’t know about the Irish, but in the Swedish system it is not unusual for an officer to sit in the same office for six or more years. My St. John’s lodge is more than 50 years old and I think we have only had 8 masters so far.

    The Swedish system of Freemasonry is Christian.

    Bro. Munkholt, intresting post as always.

    Steinarr Kr.

  3. I must apologize to any Irish brethren, as it seems I have accidentally misrepresented them in my post: Bro Radcliffe, I meant to say that we, in the Swedish Rite, use books and, as Bro Steinarr has said, do not progress through chairs in the same way.

    I shall try to amend the post to make my point clearer. [EDIT: I have tried to rephrase the post.]

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s